Saturday 15 March 2014

12) Great streams of tradition in the Old Testament


The Old Testament is often read by those who are devout but untrained as though it was all carved from one piece of stone, in one time and place, as trustworthy as it is static and unchanging. One of the great gains that has come from the sustained and meticulous study of the Bible in recent centuries is the appreciation of just how dynamic the processes are that have resulted in the Bible as we have it today. Like other disciplines the study of the Bible continues to develop as different questions and methods are used to explore the richness, depth and complexity of the Bible over  the centuries of its formation.

Source criticism is a method that has been used extensively used to trace the various streams of tradition that have been preserved in the Old Testament. The two creation accounts have been treated in earlier posts on this blog as a clear example of different traditions being preserved within biblical texts. Scholars had long been aware that there were different names used for God, and sometimes inconsistencies or duplication in narratives like that of the Flood story, that pointed in the direction of multiple points of view being combined in the final form of the Biblical text. It has been an area of study that gave rise to a theory called the Documentary hypothesis.

http://www.layevangelism.com/bastxbk/illustrations/docuhypoth.htm


In this theory great streams of tradition were not only formed over centuries, but they were also combined during the formation of the Old Testament.  According to this theory oral traditions were gradually committed to writing and preserved as traditions from the Northern tribes and kingdom were combined with those from the Southern tribes and kingdom. The major traditions have been identified as:

J - Yahwist (Southern)
E - Elohist (Northern)  J and E were combined about 700 BCE
P - Priestly (Soiuthern)
D - Deuteronomist  (about 621 BCE)


Events such as the religious reform in the time of Josiah, the fall of the northern and southern kingdoms, and then the shattering experience of the exile provided the catalyst for legal materials, narratives about the beginning of the nation, priestly traditions, and historical materials to be combined and preserved leading to the Old Testament text we are familiar with today. Different points of view about the conquest of the land, the creation of the world, necessary legal and liturgical texts and traditions are all combined in one final text. Their presence reveals something of the complexity and richness of Israel's history and the shaping of its self understanding and appreciation of its role in God's saving plan.

YouTube material you may wish to consult is readily available. Dr Christine Hayes at Yale provides a rich and comprehensive introduction to these matters. For the first of her series of lectures follow the links below.

The Parts of the Whole. Dr Christine Hayes

Of Seams and Sources. Dr Christine Hayes

Dr David Penchansky from the University of St. Thomas in Minnesota gives a helpful and brief overview of the Documentary Hypothesis.

Documentary Hypothesis

3 comments:

  1. just wondering about the seven deadly sins as listed in the Middle Ages ..... pretty much describes society of today ... are we really in the end times??? if sin is a human condition and we continue to increase our sins rather then try to control and subdue , what hope do we have for our world ??

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Milly, the observations that you make about sin and the state of society at large is one that has often been made over the centuries! We just have to look at the newspaper to feel saddened by what we can do to each other. In many ways the stories of Gen 1-11 are saying the same thing, only six centuries before the birth of Jesus. I'm not so sure that I would go so far as to say that sin is the human condition. To me it is more a matter that we always have the potential to choose what is life-giving and what is not. We are created in God's image and we have knowledge of good and evil - it's up to us. For all the bad stories there are many beautiful stories too - stories of kindness and love and self-sacrifice. I don't think we are the end-times - remember that when the book of Revelation was written they believed themselves to be in the end times, and here we are almost 2000 years later!

      Delete
  2. Thank you Chris .. I pray you are right about not being in the end times !!!!!

    ReplyDelete